Skip to content

Nypd’s trump height–weight file revealed: did a rogue tape measure spark the great BMI debate? (spoiler: it’s bananas)


Chapter 1: The NYPD’s Secret File on Trump’s Vertical Limitations (Spoiler: It’s Classified Under “Comedy”)

Inside the File: Heels, Hair, and a Tape Measure’s Existential Crisis

Deep within the labyrinthine archives of the NYPD’s “Totally Serious Evidence” locker lies a manila folder stamped “COMEDY: DO NOT LEAK (unless it’s funny)”. Rumor has it, this dossier chronicles decades of discreet *vertical investigations* into a certain Queens-born figure’s relationship with gravity. Key findings include:

  • Redacted heel lifts: Forensic analysis revealed “suspiciously springy” shoe inserts, later debated as either a fashion choice or a covert trampoline prototype.
  • Subpoenaed building permits: Turns out, Trump Tower’s elevator buttons were mysteriously lowered by 3 inches in 2004. Coincidence? The file thinks not.
  • Witness testimony: A flock of Central Park pigeons swore under oath they’d seen “a man with a cloud-like halo” arguing with a step stool. (Their credibility remains… bird-like.)

Why Classify This? The Tape Measure Mutiny of ‘97

According to *unnamed sources* (read: a disgruntled deli owner near precinct HQ), the file was sealed after a 1997 incident involving a department-issue tape measure that “refused to collaborate.” Allegedly, it kept snapping shut while muttering, “I didn’t join the force to measure metaphors.” The ensuing paperwork was deemed “too chaotic for public consumption,” though insiders whisper the real reason was avoiding a diplomatic crisis with *hair altitude control*. FOIA requests have been denied on grounds of “preserving the sanctity of satire.”

You may also be interested in:  The untold saga of zach bryan’s ex-girlfriend: a llama, a kazoo and one unhinged voicemail (yes, really)

Chapter 2: Trump vs. The NYPD’s Dunk Contest: A Height Scandal of Epic Proportions

When Vertical Leaps Met Vertical “Facts”

Picture this: a dimly lit gymnasium, the scent of sweat and subpoenas lingering in the air. Donald Trump, clad in gold-lettered ankle socks, squares off against a squad of NYPD officers in a charity dunk contest that *no one* saw coming—except maybe Rudy Giuliani, who reportedly mistook the event for a “filing paperwork” competition. The drama? Height gatekeeping. The scandal? Trump’s insistence that his vertical leap “totally counts” because his hair “technically grazed the rim.” The NYPD, however, brought receipts: a measuring tape, a ladder, and a forensic accountant.

The Evidence Board (Because of Course There’s an Evidence Board)

Allegations flew faster than a sneaker thrown in protest:

  • Trump’s claim of a “48-inch vertical” (later clarified as “48 inches, including elevator shoes”).
  • The NYPD’s counterargument: “Sir, the net’s *supposed* to sag.”
  • A rogue tweet declaring “Dunking is just a liberal hoax anyway.”

Meanwhile, viral footage of the event—set to *Space Jam* music—showed officers executing slam dunks with bureaucratic precision while Trump argued the rim was “mounted by a Democrat.” Critics noted his insistence on using a “regulation-sized step stool” as a “campaign donation.”

Layups, Lawsuits, and Loopholes

The fallout was… moist. A press conference devolved into a debate over whether Trump’s hair constituted a “reach advantage,” with the NYPD producing a 1993 *Sports Illustrated* photo proving his fadeaway jumper had always been “more metaphor than movement.” The department later unveiled a “Dunk Truth Calculator” on their website, which auto-replies to height inquiries with “Nice try.” And somewhere in Mar-a-Lago, a golden basketball hoop collects dust—allegedly set at 9 feet tall “for security reasons.”

Chapter 3: Weighed Down by Questions: The NYPD’s Scale Intervention

Picture this: the NYPD, a sprawling force trained to combat crime, suddenly finds itself in a glaring standoff with… kitchen scales. Not the drug-busting, evidence-bag kind—no, we’re talking about the “did someone borrow this to weigh their artisanal sourdough starter?” kind. In a twist that left everyone from rookies to captains scratching their heads (and possibly checking their pantry shelves), the department rolled out a mandate requiring officers to document every scale encountered during routine patrols. Why? Officially, to curb “suspicious culinary activity.” Unofficially? Rumor has it a deputy commissioner’s soufflé collapsed mid-dinner party, and things got personal.

The Great Scale Census of 2022: A Paperwork Apocalypse

Officers were suddenly moonlighting as forensic baking inspectors, filing reports on:

  • “Scale, stainless steel, 0.1g precision—located next to a suspiciously fluffy muffin.”
  • “Digital device, unknown origin, displaying ‘2.5 lbs’—allegedly used to weigh a Chihuahua named Mr. Pickles.”
  • “Antique balance scale, dusty, possibly a metaphor for the imbalance of justice.” (That last one was from Officer Jenkins, who’d recently discovered Philosophy 101.)

The directive spiraled into chaos when precincts began arguing whether “mandatory scale registration” applied to bathroom scales confiscated from gyms. Spoiler: No one won that debate.

Collateral Damage: Coffee, Donuts, and Existential Dread

You may also be interested in:  Who is matthew knies’ girlfriend? the mystery we never saw coming (and why is she obsessed with llama pajamas?)

As paperwork piled higher than a Brooklyn cheesecake, patrol officers faced a new nemesis: the existential weight of their assignments. One rookie was overheard muttering, “I joined to stop robberies, not to assess if a deli owner’s pasta portioning was a cry for help.” Meanwhile, donut shop clerks developed a Pavlovian flinch at the sight of officers eyeing their frosting-loaded scales. The city’s caffeine supply teetered on collapse after a sergeant attempted to “calibrate” a Starbucks barista’s espresso scale—allegedly “for accuracy.” The incident ended with a latte art rendition of a frowny face. Priorities, people!

-